The three sites all collect and aggregate their data at different times of the day, and monitor a different number of projects (between 67 and 145). I looked at three of the major statistics sites: BOINCstats (which tends to be regarded as authoritative by David Anderson) BOINC Combined Statistics (the in-house stats site - the power behind those 'Projects in which you are participating' lists on your account pages at BOINC projects) and Free-DC (the source of the graphs on BOINC's Top 100 multi-project BOINC participants page). Well, since I'm helping to look at various aspects of the credit system at the moment, I thought I'd have a scout around. All of those might be diluting the value Richard points out, I don't know.Īll of those might be diluting the value Richard points out, I don't know. There have been fan-based projects in the past, there are probably still fan-based projects this moment, that run nothing but Uppercase and give out credit for that. Now to give you an idea: even you can start a project today that pays twelve trillion credit per task done on the Uppercase application included in the package. Everything is open source, everything can be hacked, edited, reprogrammed, adjusted, tinkered with to the hearts content of the project administrator. Aside from perhaps not being included in the Projects List. Not much there can be done to force a project to follow the will of BOINC development, while users can en-masse say that they leave the place. Maybe, but then that's normally done by the users rather than the BOINC development team, for the simple reason of what to do when they would request that a project follow their credit sampling, and the project says "no"? I think a more reasonable request would be to have the project look at their credit distribution, is it as skewed for non-ASIC devices?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |